{"id":2791,"date":"2011-05-13T00:01:04","date_gmt":"2011-05-12T12:01:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/?p=2791"},"modified":"2012-06-06T17:59:16","modified_gmt":"2012-06-06T05:59:16","slug":"monteiths-single-source","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2011\/05\/13\/monteiths-single-source\/","title":{"rendered":"Monteith’s ‘Single Source’"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Monteith's<\/a>
Monteith's 'Single Source'<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Once more unto the brandwank<\/a>, dear friends, once more.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

— Not quite Henry V<\/em><\/p>\n

This one positively reeks<\/em> of being a project out of the marketing department rather than one with its origins in the brain of a brewer, beer drinker, or normal person<\/em>. At the time I’m putting this post together (in early July), a cursory Google search still more-readily produces\u00a0write-ups concerning the beer’s branding (such as its packaging<\/a> and website<\/a>) than it does things which address, you know, the beer itself. The ‘pitch’ is simple: a beer produced using ingredients from just one barley farm, and just one hop farm.<\/p>\n

But immediately, of course, there’s a snag. That’s not “Single Source” at all. I’ve mentioned\u00a0two<\/em> farms already. And then there’s a brewery in Timaru — not at either<\/em> farm, and<\/em> not anywhere near the home of Monteith’s in Greymouth on the West Coast. The water is from the area around the brewery, but the yeast is from god-knows-where and doesn’t actually rate a mention. So that’s four<\/em> sources for a modern beer’s four canonical ingredients, two (i.e., half) of which aren’t really discussed, and a muddling of a historic (small-town) brewery with a modern (national) ‘brand’. <\/em>If they were talking about\u00a0an estate<\/em> beer, made with barley and hops grown at the brewery, it might be worthy of the title — and such things do exist<\/em><\/a>.1<\/sup> Here, they’ve gone 1) catchy name, 2) half-assery.<\/p>\n

Their precious Latitude \/ Longitude references don’t even make any damn sense. The location given for the origin of the hops<\/a> — with its six decimal places — traces them to the grower’s front garden, rather than his fields. There’s some mention of the hop-farmer thinking his Southern Cross hops were particularly suited to the ‘microclimate’ in his garden in the official writeup<\/a>, but there don’t appear to be any actually growing in that part of his property, and if they are<\/em> just from his front yard, how ridiculously few<\/em> have they used?\u00a0Then, the coordinates for the barley<\/a> — with their even-more-insane seven<\/em> decimals — appear to point to the farmer’s driveway, or at least the hedgerow that runs along it. Something’s amiss; given their relative proportions in the brewing process, there’s just no way you could be more<\/em> precise about the source of your barley than of your hops. And I called attention to their decimal places<\/a> for good reason: six digits narrows you down to a tenth<\/em> of a metre, seven digits basically gets you within a single centimeter<\/em>. It’s an utterly stupid degree of “accuracy”, one that is just bursting with wank and ironically so “precise” it’s just obviously wrong<\/em>. Three decimal places would pinpoint an area of roughly a hundred-or-so metres, and would thereby count as information<\/em> rather than just bullshit.<\/p>\n

On top of that<\/em>, as Matt Kirkegaard pointed out<\/a> (when he held his nose and read their over-inflated press release), it’s an absolutely bizarre kind of self-undermining<\/em> bullshit if you stop to think about it for more than a second. It accidentally implies all sorts<\/em> of terrible things about the beers in the same range: that they’re made without any real care or attention paid to the quality of their ingredients, that they’re utterly divorced from their roots (fitting for ‘Radler’, perhaps, but hardly inkeeping with the story for their ‘Original Ale’), and they’re not really worth protecting from getting lightstruck and skunked. If you go to conspicuous lengths to emphasise something apparently-worthy about one<\/em> of your products, it starts to look rather odd that you aren’t really worried about that allegedly-serious concern when it comes to your others<\/em>.<\/p>\n

This isn’t remotely unique<\/em> to Monteith’s and “Single Source”, of course. The same thing happens with the aggressively ‘all-natural’ marketing of Steinlager “Pure” — just what the fuck sort of witchcraft and chemical buggery and radioactive goo are they telling me is lurking in regular<\/em> Steinlager? It’s probably partially a by-product of different projects being farmed out to different ad agencies, but it’s in particularly stark relief with this black-bottled, relentlessly brandwanked beer — especially given the fuckups the execution of its ‘story’, and the incredible sameyness<\/em> of the product. And<\/em> they have the unmitigated gall (amidst a fancy-pants website<\/a> that tries desperately to be Down Home and simultaneously Ultra Modern) to describe their goal as:<\/p>\n

A beer that didn’t need to rely on hype to be appreciated. A beer for the love of beer, if you like.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To which I have two-and-a-half responses: 1)\u00a0like balls<\/em> — and 2) if that w<\/em>as<\/em> the plan, then a) you failed, and b) why all the, you know, hype? The beer isn’t\u00a0terrible<\/em>, at least. It’s the usual kind of basically-faultless but basically-featureless sort of thing we’ve come to expect from this corner of the market. It felt a bit like the label copy had been written in advance, or by someone who’d never met the beer (or perhaps a dictionary); it definitely<\/em> wasn’t “aromatic”, though it did have a funk-free and pleasant mild nose, and it was certainly more in the realm of what normal people would call “smooth” than “crisp” (the lager-advertiser’s fallback adjective).<\/p>\n

If we put it in its proper context of overly-marketed mild-to-flavourless lagers with delusions of grandeur, then I suppose I’d rather have one of these than a Budweiser<\/a>. In that sense, and in that sense alone, it’s alright. But, to borrow the masterful conclusion from Hadyn Green’s piece on the subject<\/a>:<\/p>\n

In the end the fakers always lose, or run off following some other trend… Craft beer is like comic collecting, antiquing, cave diving, wine drinking or any other hobby — the interest for the enthusiast is the story. But the story can\u2019t be tacked onto a paper-thin attempt. No one cares about the director\u2019s commentary on a terrible film.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The beer itself<\/em> is a non-disaster, and yet everything about “Monteith’s Single Source” is a clusterfuck of awfulness. Each word<\/em> literally fails;\u00a0the ad-man’s version of the world requires that you 1) ignore “Monteith’s”, lest you think less of their other products for lacking the prized black bottle, 2) not understand the word “single” or have any idea what goes into a beer or how many varieties might be used, and 3) not actually look up the “source” using the coordinates provided, in case you realise that their absurdly long string of digits is rather hollow and stupid and possibly some peculiar sort of geographical \/ mathematical equivalent to the kind of large, flashy (and, you know, overcompensatory<\/em>) cars some men feel the need to be seen driving.<\/p>\n

Verbatim:<\/strong> Monteith’s ‘Single Source’ Lager 13\/5\/11 330ml 5% @ MH Some 30th Birthday resonance with my Steinlager Edge, and a nice reminder that Moa aren’t the only local brandwankers. The ‘pitch’ is offensively daft, overwrought and ironically-damning of their main range. And it’s not single<\/span> source, is it? The beer is freakishly pale — maybe the black bottle blocks out too much sun… Faint nose, mercifully funkless. Certainly not “aromatic”, though. Nice intial feel (though it’s more smooth than “crisp”), but the flavour, such as it is, is quickly tied to a piano and pushed off a bridge. It’s very<\/span> nothing. A sad, wasted opportunity.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Monteith's<\/a>
Monteith's 'Single Source', wanky ramble<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\"Monteith's<\/a>
Diary II entry #102, Monteith's 'Single Source' Lager<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

1:<\/strong> So no, marketing division, this isn’t “a revolutionary new beer”. Even if you had<\/em> made something genuinely “single source”, you wouldn’t have been the first.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Once more unto the brandwank, dear friends, once more. — Not quite Henry V This one positively reeks of being a project out of the marketing department rather than one with its origins in the brain of a brewer, beer drinker, or normal person. At the time I’m putting this post together (in early July), … Continue reading Monteith’s ‘Single Source’<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[36,6,14,9,8],"class_list":["post-2791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-diary","tag-brandwank","tag-pages","tag-nz","tag-lager","tag-photogenic"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5301,"url":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2012\/11\/21\/crafty-beggars\/","url_meta":{"origin":2791,"position":0},"title":"Crafty Beggars","author":"Phil","date":"November 21, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"It is, apparently, Brandwank Monsoon Season. At least I won't suffer for material.1\u00a0As was spotted by the eagle eye of Dominic (from Hashigo Zake) some months ago in the Trademark Registry, \"Crafty Beggars\" is a new brand \/ imprint \/ stealth-fake-brewery2 from one half of the local duopoly, Lion. And\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Actual Diary entries"","block_context":{"text":"Actual Diary entries","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/category\/diary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Crafty Beggars bottles","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Crafty-Beggars-bottles-300x168.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7154,"url":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2014\/04\/25\/monteiths-american-pale-ale\/","url_meta":{"origin":2791,"position":1},"title":"Monteith’s “American Pale Ale”","author":"Phil","date":"April 25, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Over the decade I've been taking handwritten notes of my beer-drinking experiences, I have inevitably developed an idiosyncratic Style Guide.1\u00a0Broadly \u2014 though there are exceptions early on as the pattern developed, and sporadically throughout as I either forgot my own practice or thought of\u00a0some now-lost rationalisation for a variance in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Actual Diary entries"","block_context":{"text":"Actual Diary entries","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/category\/diary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Monteith's \"American Pale Ale\" (My house, 18 March 2014)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Monteiths-American-Pale-Ale.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Monteiths-American-Pale-Ale.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Monteiths-American-Pale-Ale.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":3682,"url":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2012\/05\/07\/the-chosen-one-choosing\/","url_meta":{"origin":2791,"position":2},"title":"The ‘Chosen One’ Choosing","author":"Phil","date":"May 7, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"'Boundary Road Brewery' needs scare-quotes around it, because it's not properly a\u00a0thing. It's a sub-brand of Independent Liquor, who were recently acquired by Japanese supergiant Asahi, and they're trying to position themselves as a \"craft brewer\" alongside the pseudo-craft imprints of D.B. and Lion (i.e., Monteith's and Mac's)1\u00a0and elbow their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Actual Diary entries"","block_context":{"text":"Actual Diary entries","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/category\/diary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Choosing the 'Chosen One', blind","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Boundary-Road-The-Chosen-One-tasting-session-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4937,"url":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2012\/07\/26\/porter-noir\/","url_meta":{"origin":2791,"position":3},"title":"‘Porter Noir’","author":"Phil","date":"July 26, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"So Monteith's \u2014 i.e., D.B. (i.e., Asia Pacific Breweries) \u2014 has re-commissioned the Greymouth brewery that they, in a near-unprecedented display of tin-eared-ness, originally decided to close back in 2001. It was essentially a museum for several years, but they've decided to spark it up again, to produce a range\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Rambles and rants"","block_context":{"text":"Rambles and rants","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/category\/blahblah\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Monteith's 'Single Source'","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Monteiths-Single-Source1-225x300.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1397,"url":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2009\/03\/23\/moa-st-joseph\/","url_meta":{"origin":2791,"position":4},"title":"Moa ‘St. Joseph’","author":"Phil","date":"March 23, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Moa brewery in Blenheim is the work of Josh Scott, son of winemaker Allan Scott. And it really does have a significant \"wanky side-project of spoilt rich kid\" air about the whole thing. The beers are particularly expensive, nobbishly marketed -- and unforgivably naff all too often. I suppose when\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Actual Diary entries"","block_context":{"text":"Actual Diary entries","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/category\/diary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Moa 'St. Joseph'","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Moa-St-Joseph-225x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":18004,"url":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/2016\/03\/29\/beer-diary-podcast-s05e05\/","url_meta":{"origin":2791,"position":5},"title":"Beer Diary Podcast s05e05: Crowd, Fun, Ding","author":"Phil","date":"March 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Damn these recurrent hiatuses. It happened again, as these things do. But we're back this week \u2014 rather fittingly, after the long weekend \u2014 with a little look at crowdfunding in the beer business, some reminiscences over my marvellous trip to the Mussel Inn, and looking forward to the Great\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Podcast episodes"","block_context":{"text":"Podcast episodes","link":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/category\/podcast-episodes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mussel Inn tap bank, plus miscellany","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mussel-Inn-Taps-and-chaos-150x150.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2791"}],"version-history":[{"count":45,"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2791\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4289,"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2791\/revisions\/4289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philcook.net\/beerdiary\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}